Which of the following actions should a CDR take when objections arise during a deposition?

The appropriate action for a Certified Deposition Reporter when objections arise during a deposition is to note the objections but continue recording. This practice is crucial because depositions are formal proceedings where the record must accurately reflect what is happening, including any legal objections raised by the attorneys.

By noting the objections, the reporter ensures that there is a detailed record of all comments and interruptions, which may be important for later review by the attorneys, the judge, or other parties involved in the litigation. Continuing to record allows the deposition to proceed without unnecessary interruptions, maintaining the flow of testimony.

This approach balances the need to document legal disputes (the objections) while preserving the integrity of the witness's testimony. It helps ensure that the final transcript will accurately capture any issues that could arise during court proceedings or be addressed later on.

In contrast, ignoring the objections would undermine the legal process, engaging in objections could compromise the neutrality of the reporter, and immediately clarifying with the witness may disrupt the deposition and create an impression of bias.