Why might an attorney request a rough draft of a deposition?

An attorney might request a rough draft of a deposition primarily for immediate reference or review before finalizing the transcript. Rough drafts are typically produced quickly and can provide a preliminary look at the content of the deposition. This allows attorneys to assess the testimony given during the deposition, identify key points, and develop their strategies while the information is still fresh. It enables them to prepare effectively for subsequent legal proceedings, making any necessary adjustments or refining their arguments before the official transcript is available.

The other options, while potentially relevant in some contexts, do not focus on the immediacy and utility of a rough draft for preparation. For instance, while cross-examination preparation is important, the rough draft serves more as a tool for quick reference rather than as direct material for cross-examination. Sharing the document with opposing counsel is unlikely since rough drafts are typically considered internal documents and not official. Moreover, a rough draft would not be formally admissible as evidence in court, as it lacks the verified accuracy and completeness of a final transcript.